Research on the Institutional Logic and Practical Path of Standardization in Optimizing the Business Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64051/jhn.v1i3.69Keywords:
standardization, business environment, institutional logic, governance modernization, practical pathAbstract
Optimizing the business environment is an important measure to promote high-quality economic development and stimulate the vitality of market entities. In recent years, China has continued to promote the "streamlining administration, delegating powers, and improving regulation and services" reform, emphasizing institutional innovation and the modernization of governance capabilities. Against this background, standardization, as an important tool to improve government governance efficiency, regulate market behavior, and reduce institutional transaction costs, has increasingly become a key support for optimizing the business environment. Starting from the institutional logic, this article systematically analyzes the internal mechanisms of standardization in improving transparency, enhancing predictability, and promoting fair competition. Combining typical domestic practices, it proposes a practical path for leading the reform of the business environment with standards, including improving the standard system, promoting digital empowerment, strengthening implementation supervision, and promoting international integration, providing theoretical support and policy recommendations for building a market-oriented, law-based, and internationalized business environment.
References
[1]Kang Junsheng, Zhang Zhaocui. Research on standardization of optimizing business environment in market supervision field[J]. Standard Science, 2021, No.562(03):47-52.
[2]Xie Hongxing. The justification, evaluation and approach of the rule of law business environment: from theoretical logic to institutional development[J]. Learning and Practice, 2019, No.429(11):36-46.
[3]Cheng Bohui. Institution-Capacity: The Governance Framework and Its Verification for Optimizing the Business Environment[J]. Administrative Forum, 2020, 27(02): 106-111.
[4]Dai Lin, Sun Tao. Construction of a legal business environment from a comparative perspective: Gap identification and bridging approaches - an analysis based on the World Bank's "Doing Business Report" [J]. Journal of Liaoning Academy of Socialism, 2020, No. 85(04): 76-83.
[5]Yang Jun, Liu Peng. Improvement of business environment system and optimization of paths: Based on the third-party perspective[J]. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2019, No.291(02):35-44.
[6]Liao Fuchong. Governance modernization, approval reform and business environment: reform results and policy implications[J]. Economic System Reform, 2020, No.220(01):5-12.
[7]Liao Fuchong, Zhang Chun. “Streamlining administration, delegating powers, strengthening regulation and improving services” reform and business environment construction: an analytical framework of institutional costs[J]. Secretary, 2020, No.388(04):3-12.
[8]Liao Fuchong. Has the “streamlining administration, delegating powers, delegating powers, and improving administration” reform optimized the business environment? — A statistical analysis based on data from 6144 private enterprises[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2020, 42(07): 74-82.
[9]Luo Ying, Shi Jiale. Further optimization of the “streamlining administration, delegating powers, strengthening regulation and improving services” reform under the background of optimizing the business environment: market supervision reform led by the “China Business Environment Report 2020”[J]. China Market Supervision Research, 2021, No.340(02):34-38.
[10]Feng Ye. Construction of an evaluation index system for a rule of law business environment[J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2020, No.242(02):120-128.
[11]Zhang Zhanbin. The significance and key tasks of optimizing the business environment during the 14th Five-Year Plan period[J]. Administrative Management Reform, 2020, No.136(12):4-10.
