Research on the Construction of Government Performance Management System from a Standardization Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64051/jhn.v1i3.67Keywords:
Standardization, Government Performance Management, Performance Evaluation, Governance System, Public ServicesAbstract
With the continuous development of public management theory and the advancement of government governance modernization, government performance management has gradually become a crucial means to enhance administrative efficiency and optimize public service quality. However, China's current government performance management system still suffers from issues such as inconsistent standards, strong subjectivity in evaluation, and insufficient application of results. This paper, from the perspective of standardization, explores the construction path of a government performance management system, aiming to enhance its standardization and effectiveness by establishing a scientific, systematic, and operable standardized framework. The article first elaborates on the connotation and significance of government performance management, then analyzes the problems within the existing management system, and proposes the theoretical foundation and practical pathways for standardized construction. It aims to provide theoretical support and practical reference for the scientific and standardized development of government performance management in China.
References
1.Wang, L. S. (2021). *Research on the Implementation Problems and Countermeasures of Standardized Performance Management in the Department of Finance of H Province* [Master's thesis, Hebei University of Science and Technology]. DOI:10. [Note: Original DOI seems incomplete; kept as is. Usually, a full DOI number would be provided.]
2.Xu, B. L., & Chen, Y. Q. (2021). Research on the Standardization of Budget Performance Management in Government Departments——Taking the Department of Economy and Information Technology of Hubei Province as an Example. *Administrative State-owned Assets & Finance*, (11), 24-27.
3.Shen, X. L., & Zhong, M. (2020). Research on Innovation of Government Performance Evaluation——Based on the Reference of Enterprise Performance Evaluation from the Perspective of Service-Oriented Government. *Journal of Yunnan Administration College*, 22(02), 159-165.
4.Chen, S. X., & Zhang, J. X. (2022). Research on the Influence Mechanism of Local Government Management Standardization Innovation——Taking Xianning City as an Example. *Journal of Yunnan Administration College*, 24(02), 112-120. DOI [Note: Original citation lacked a specific DOI number; kept as is.]
5.Ran, M. (2016). A Review of Research on the Legalization of Foreign Government Performance Management——Taking the United States, Australia, Japan, and South Korea as Examples. *Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute*, 18(01), 88-95.
6.Yu, H. Y. (2011). Research on Performance Evaluation of Local Government Departments Based on ISO9000 Series Standards. *Science and Technology Management Research*, 31(17), 75-79.
7.Tong, Y. J., & Pu, S. (2017). The Evolution and Enlightenment of Government Performance Management Thought under the Guidance of Public Administrative Value. *Journal of Neijiang Normal University*, 32(09), 92-96.
8.Liu, X. Y. (2015). Research on the Scientification of Performance Management Indicator System in Government Departments. *Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition)*, 14(04), 41-47.
9.Shen, M. M. (2017). *Analysis of Influencing Factors of Performance Appraisal Indicator System from the Perspective of Service-Oriented Government* [Master's thesis, Nanjing University].
10. Meng, Q. G., & Liu, X. Y. (2017). The Path Choice for Local Governments to Use Performance Management Tools——A Case Study of Participatory Observation of Target Responsibility System Performance Management in City B. *Administrative Tribune*, 24(06), 50-55.
11. Wang, Y., & He, W. S. (2021). Local Government Performance Improvement: An Analysis Framework of "Pressure—Motivation". *Administrative Tribune*, 28(04), 58-65+2. [Note: The "+2" might indicate a page range continuation or special note in the original journal.]
12. Shang, H. P. (2020). The Paradox Between the Objectivity of Government Performance Data Generation and the Subjectivity of Performance Data Selection and Its Resolution——An Exploration of a Path to Solve the Problem of Government Comprehensive Performance Management Becoming a Mere Formality. *Chinese Public Administration*, No. 422(08), 109-117.
13. Wei, L. (2013). The Enlightenment of the Successful Experience of American Benchmarking Management Method on China's Government Performance Evaluation. *Youthful Years*, No. 503(15), 367.
