Research on International Experience and Local Adaptation of Public Affairs Standardization in Urban Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64051/jhn.v1i3.66Keywords:
urban governance, public affairs, standardization, international experience, local adaptationAbstract
Against the backdrop of accelerating global urbanization, urban governance faces multiple pressures, including dense populations, resource constraints, and diverse public service demands. Managing public affairs efficiently, equitably, and sustainably has become a core issue for governments worldwide. In recent years, public affairs standardization has emerged as a crucial tool for enhancing urban governance. By establishing unified technical specifications, service processes, and management guidelines, standardization helps reduce administrative costs, improve service consistency, and enhance public trust in government. However, standardization is not a one-size-fits-all governance model. Significant differences in political systems, administrative cultures, and social structures exist across countries, leading to diverse standardization practices in different contexts. Therefore, while drawing on international experience, it is crucial to prioritize local adaptation to avoid incompatibility. This article aims to analyze the public affairs standardization practices of representative international cities, identify valuable lessons, and explore their applicability and optimization paths in urban governance in China.
References
[1]Jin Tong. Development ideas, policy recommendations and case analysis of Shanghai urban management standardization[J]. Shanghai Real Estate, 2019, No.385(03):17-21.
[2]Jiang Li, Liu Jianyun, Xiong Yan, et al. Research on the construction of basic public service standard system: Taking the comprehensive pilot practice of basic public service standardization in Chengdu Hi-tech Zone as an example[J]. China Standardization, 2022, No.598(01):125-131.
[3]Zhou Yonggen. Theory and Practice of Urban Management Standardization in the Process of New Urbanization: A Case Study of Beijing [C]//Hunan Provincial Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision, Hunan University, China Standardization Press. "Standardization and Governance" - Proceedings of the Second International Forum. China Standardization Press, 2017:10.
[4]Deng Pin, Shi Genqiang. A brief analysis of standardization in the field of basic public services[J]. China Standardization, 2018, No.524(12):228-229.
[5]Wang Yuchen, Song Mingshun. Analysis on the layout, structure and effectiveness of the national social management and public service standardization pilot projects[J]. Standard Science, 2022, No.575(04):27-31.
[6]Xin Lulu. An analysis of the standardization of public services of grassroots governments in the process of urban governance modernization[J]. Qingdao Municipal Party School of the Communist Party of China. Journal of Qingdao Administration Institute, 2020, No. 262(04): 45-49.
[7]Kern, K.. "Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe." Environmental Politics (2018).
[8]Heijden, J.. "City and Subnational Governance: High Ambitions, Innovative Instruments and Polycentric Collaborations?." (2018).
[9]Zhang Qian, Geng Xiao, Ma Zhengying. Standardization of basic government public services: A case study of basic urban and rural public services in Hebei Province[J]. China Management Informationization, 2015, 18(01): 219-220.
[10]Lu Wenchao. Standardization of basic public services in the process of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei integration[J]. People's Forum·Academic Frontier, 2017, No.129(17):58-61.
